Evidence Gathered from Stakeholders
Our evidence gathering highlighted several markets which might not be working well for Scottish consumers. The following section highlights some of the key issues that have been raised that we will now consider in more detail. We will work closely with key stakeholders and Scottish Government colleagues in order to address the areas identified in the assessment through our action plan.
CONSUMERS AND BUSINESSES IN SCOTLAND
Open and competitive markets together with effective competition policy have the ability to drive economic growth. In a well-functioning market, consumers give businesses a clear indication of their preferences. As a result, businesses that provide products that consumers want will prosper while others will not.
Competition puts businesses under pressure to offer the best products at the best possible price. This provides firms with strong incentives to improve productivity, reduce prices and to innovate. As a consequence, consumers should have a wider choice, lower prices and higher quality goods. The aim of competition policy is to address areas where markets are not necessarily delivering the best outcomes for consumers.
The CMA reviewed evidence and found that competition drives productivity in three ways:
- competition acts as a disciplining device, placing pressure on managers of firms to become more efficient;
- competition ensures that more productive firms increase their market share at the expensive of the less productive; and
- competition drives firms to innovate, coming up with new products and processes which can lead to increases in efficiency. 
ACTION: The Scottish Government will seek to gain a better understanding of the links between productivity and competition with the aim of developing metrics to measure this relationship.
Businesses' Awareness of Competition Policy and Law
During 2015, the CMA undertook both quantitative and qualitative research into businesses' awareness of competition law.  This research found that the majority (77 per cent) of businesses either did not know competition law very well or hadn't heard of it at all, with awareness particularly low amongst small and medium enterprises. Whilst the proportion of Scottish businesses with a strong awareness of competition law (27 per cent) was higher than the UK average (23 per cent), this low level of awareness highlights that further work is needed. 
The CMA has launched a campaign to increase awareness of competition amongst businesses.  However, the Scottish Government believes that more can be done at a Scottish level to increase businesses' engagement with competition law and policy.
ACTION: The Scottish Government will work with business organisations to carry out research into Scottish businesses' attitudes to competition and competition issues and will consider how to engage businesses more in competition matters.
Disruptive Technologies and the Sharing Economy
Technology changes the way we do things and disruptive technologies transform markets by innovating and allowing for the more efficient use of resources. Whilst disruptive technologies (or innovation) and the sharing economy are not the same, the impact that these alternative business models will have on markets are similar.
'Disruptive Innovation' has been defined as 'the phenomenon by which an innovation transforms an existing market or sector by introducing simplicity, convenience, accessibility, and affordability where complication and high cost are the status quo.'  Whilst the sharing economy - where individuals share human and physical resources - allows people to utilise unused or underused assets, allowing individuals to make money by sharing resources, time and skills across online platforms. 
As access to technology, in particular mobile technology, has rapidly increased, the development of disruptive technology and the sharing economy has become more prominent in many sectors of the economy, changing the way consumers purchase goods and services. A key characteristic of disruptive technologies is the speed with which they transform markets. This is particularly important when compared with the speed of legislation and changes to regulations. This means that Government and regulators need to be agile in their response to changes to markets. As shown in Figure 4, disruptive technologies have had a significant impact across sectors and are likely to continue to do so.
Figure 3: Examples of Disruptive Technologies
The world's largest taxi company owns no taxis
The largest accommodation provider owns no real estate
The largest phone company owns no telecoms infrastructure
The most popular media owner creates no content
The world's largest movie house owns no cinemas
|Apple & Google:||
The largest software vendors do not write the apps
Disruptive technologies bring significant benefits to consumers, competition and the economy through lower prices, greater choice and better service. PwC has calculated that, on a global basis, the sharing economy is currently worth £9 billion and this is set to rise to £230 billion by 2025.  Furthermore, disruptive technologies allow for a more efficient use of underused resources by allowing people to share their resources through online platforms. This also allows individuals to benefit from more flexible working arrangements as well as new ways of supplementing their incomes. 
However, these benefits must be balanced with the need for regulation and for these new businesses and traditional operators to be treated fairly with no unfair competitive advantage. A key element of debate surrounding disruptive technologies is the degree to which they should be regulated. Often, market structures and regulation can create barriers to new entrants. Where there are such barriers to entering a market, these regulations and structures should be reviewed to ensure that they encourage competition and, consequently, increase consumer choice. It is important that consideration is also given to regulation which may have become obsolete or may discourage innovation in the market. Regulation must be proportionate, encourage innovation and provide a favourable business environment in which all companies can grow and flourish.
On the other hand, new businesses are often competing with existing providers but are not necessarily bound by the same rules and regulations. The existence of a regulatory gap between new and incumbent operators can lead to an issue of market fairness. It is also likely that new technologies may disrupt a market and quickly become the dominant firm in this market. Key examples of this include Google and Facebook. Dominance in itself is not an issue, but firms must be monitored closely to ensure that there is no abuse of this dominant position.
Disruptive technologies bring significant benefits for consumers through greater choice and lower prices. However, these benefits must be balanced with the need to protect consumers. In particular, it is important to ensure that health and safety standards are in place and that consumers are given sufficient information to make an informed choice in these markets.
Further analysis is needed to understand where the balance is between encouraging competition and ensuring regulation is appropriate to ensure there is no competitive advantage nor unintended consequences. The Scottish Government will be looking at the issues around disruptive technologies in detail in the coming months. Specifically on regulation, the independent Regulatory Review Group is also undertaking a review of the regulatory environment within Scotland for key sectors affected by digital disruption to ensure that it remains appropriate to encourage and support innovation while maintaining a level playing field.
Disruptive technologies transform current business models. In Scotland, we must ensure that Scottish businesses are able to capitalise on these disruptions and have the necessary tools and ability to enter these markets should they wish to. It is also important to ensure that market structures and features are not unnecessarily restricting the entry of new disruptive business models.
ACTION: As part of a wider package of work considering the balance between competition and regulation, the Scottish Government will carry out research to consider how to ensure Scottish businesses are able to make the most of the arrival of disruptive technologies and that market structures do not unnecessarily restrict the entry of new disruptive business models.
Our stakeholders in the consumer landscape have provided a wealth of data on the experiences of Scottish consumers, particularly in relation to how Scottish consumers fare in comparison to those in the rest of the UK. Whilst not all consumer issues will be the consequence of competition concerns, understanding those areas where Scottish consumers face detriment and suffer harm will be key to ensuring markets work well in the interests of consumers, businesses and the Scottish economy. Empowered consumers drive firms to compete. Consumers help increase competition by purchasing goods from the business that offers them the best combination of price, features and quality. Businesses that do not meet the needs of consumers will be forced to change their product or leave the market.
Scottish Consumers' Experiences
Insight from consumer stakeholders shows that essential services, such as energy, transport and banking are those which consumers experience the most issues with, reflecting both the importance of these services to everyday life of Scottish consumers and ensuring that the Scotland's economic, geographic and social make-up does not result in gaps in access to or choices in these sectors.
Data from Ombudsman Services, an ombudsman service that provides dispute resolution across a number of sectors, found that  :
- There were 5.1 million consumer complaints in Scotland in 2015.
- The number of consumer complaints varied considerably by region in Scotland from 3.05 complaints per head in the West of Scotland to 2.34 in the South of Scotland (Figure 5).
- The most common sectors for complaints in Scotland were retail (35 per cent of complaints), telecommunications (17 per cent), energy (11 per cent) and banking (7 per cent). As Figure 6 shows, this differs slightly from consumer experiences in the UK as a whole.
Figure 4: Complaints by region, Scotland (2015)
Source: Consumer Action Monitor, Ombudsman Services
Figure 5: Complaints by sector, Scotland and the
Source: Consumer Action Monitor, Ombudsman Services
In order to develop a strategy for consumer protection and competition that ensures that informed and empowered consumers make the most of competitive markets and encourages and rewards businesses which are innovative, efficient and fair, the Scottish Government needs to develop knowledge and understanding of the thinking and influences of Scottish businesses and consumers. There is a perception that Scottish consumers tend to behave differently to consumers in other parts of the UK. In particular, it is believed that Scottish consumers are more likely to be loyal to a particular brand. For example the findings of the CMA energy market investigation found that Scotland and Wales appeared to show higher degrees of incumbent brand loyalty. 
ACTION: The Scottish Government will consider whether the demographic and geographic circumstances of Scottish consumers have an impact on their behaviour or whether there is a cultural tendency for Scottish consumers to be more loyal to Scottish brands, particularly in the regulated sectors.
Consumer Switching in the Regulated Sectors
In order for competitive markets to function effectively, consumers need to be actively engaged in markets in order to place competitive pressure on businesses. Across sectors, consumer switching remains relatively low, particularly in the regulated sectors of energy, telecoms and banking. Figure 7 below shows the proportion of consumers that switched utility supplier in the last 12 months.
Figure 6: Proportion of
UK consumers who have
switched utility supplier in the last 12 months (2015)
Source: Ofcom, The Consumer Experience 2015
The Scottish Government held a stakeholder event in July 2015 which considered whether there is a need for a specific Scottish approach to consumer switching. There was consensus amongst participants that consumer switching appears to be a particular issue in Scotland. For example, the findings of the CMA energy market investigation found that there were lower levels of consumer engagement in the market in Scotland than in England.  This may, in part, be due to a higher rate of incumbent brand loyalty in Scotland. However, we are keen to gain a better understanding of why levels of engagement appear to be lower in Scotland in the regulated sectors than in England.
A key underlying principle is that not all consumers are the same and that different consumer characteristics lead to different switching behaviour. Therefore, different policy responses will be needed for different types of consumer. While price comparison websites provide a useful service for most consumers, for example, vulnerable consumers often do not have access to them and so may lose out.
We want to gain a better understanding of the barriers that consumers in Scotland face when switching and how better provision of information might encourage greater switching.
ACTION: The Scottish Government will undertake a survey to establish the extent of switching and the barriers that consumers face. We will use the results from this survey to identify the characteristics of different types of switchers with the aim of developing targeted policy interventions.
Vulnerable Consumers and Rural Issues in the Regulated Sectors
While competitive markets bring significant benefits to consumers, in certain sectors network effects or economies of scales cause circumstances such as natural monopolies (typically with high fixed costs and lower marginal costs) which limit the prospects for effective competition and so there is a need for regulation.  In such circumstances, it is essential to have effective, independent economic regulation which will promote effective competition, where possible, but will also promote the interests of consumers through the provision of good quality, good value, reliable services.
The Scottish Government defines a consumer as 'anyone who buys goods or digital content, or uses goods or services either in the private or public sector, now or in the future.  It is important to note that a consumer's circumstances can change rapidly and any consumer can, temporarily, become a vulnerable consumer. For example, a customer may face a bereavement or illness that puts them in a vulnerable position for only a short period of time. A vulnerable consumer, therefore, is a consumer whose personal circumstances or characteristics mean that they are especially likely to face detriment or face greater detriment than other consumers. A vulnerable consumer is also less likely to be able to protect their own interests when purchasing goods or services. In Scotland, a greater number of these consumers face detriment due to higher levels of deprivation and rurality.
In the regulated sectors, there are various competition issues that cause significant detriment to consumers, particularly vulnerable consumers, as seen in the CMA's current investigations into the retail banking and energy markets. However, even in areas where competition may be working well at a UK level, our evidence shows that there are specific market failures in Scotland due to its demographic and geographic landscape. These specific challenges can be seen in the different sectors discussed below.
The focus of the UK's regulatory approach in recent years has been to promote effective and sustainable competition. This has proved successful in large parts of the UK; but not in others. In areas where there is limited competition - a definition that could apply to large areas of Scotland - good consumer outcomes have often been lacking and the regulatory environment has not been able to incentivise or ensure the necessary investment to maintain or upgrade network infrastructure. As a result, an infrastructure deficit has been created over time, which has resulted in variable availability and quality of service across the country leading to a lack of consumer choice in some areas.
The Next Generation Access ( NGA) broadband market in Scotland provides a useful illustration of the lack of competition in Scotland (as seen in Figure 8) and shows the lower levels of coverage in Scotland compared to the rest of the UK. There are effectively two commercial suppliers - BT Openreach and Virgin Media. Ofcom's 2015 Communication Market Report for Scotland suggests that 75 per cent of premises in Scotland are able to receive Openreach fibre broadband services and 36 per cent are able to receive Virgin Media cable services. Very few areas have a choice between the two with no competition outside of the major cities and nothing north of Dundee.
Although investment from the Scottish Government, and other public sector partners, is helping to extend coverage, this demonstrates that the market does not operate in the same way across the whole of the UK. Ofcom recently undertook a Strategic Review of Digital Communication and published their initial conclusions in February 2016. These include proposals to reform the UK telecoms market by encouraging more competition, reforming Openreach, imposing tougher performance targets and improving quality of service. It remains to be seen whether these measures will address market failure in areas where there is little or no competition at both the infrastructure and services layer.
Figure 7: Broadband coverage in Scotland and
Source: Ofcom's State of the Nation: Scotland 2015
The CMA's energy market investigation has identified a number of features of the market (in both generation and retail supply) that give rise to an adverse effect on competition and has proposed a number of remedies to address these features. The CMA's final report  identified overall consumer detriment of £2 billion in 2015.
The issues faced by Scottish consumers in the retail energy market are similar to those faced by consumers in other parts of Great Britain. However, Scottish Government analysis has highlighted that the retail energy supply market in Scotland is relatively more concentrated than in Great Britain as a whole and exhibits a number of characteristics which may mean that suppliers are able to segment the market and offer different terms to certain groups for both behavioural and structural reasons. For example:
In Scotland, 20 per cent of electricity consumers are on prepayment meters compared with 16 per cent nationwide.  The figure below shows the average unit costs for different types of payment methods. The average unit cost for domestic standard electricity in the North of Scotland is higher across all three methods of payment than that of South of Scotland and UK average.
Figure 8: Average Annual Domestic Standard Electricity
Source: DECC Quarterly Energy Prices December 2015, Table 2.2.3
|Average Unit Cost||Standard Credit||Direct Debit||Prepayment|
Prepayment meter customers face bills that are 10.5 per cent higher than direct debt payments. These issues are exacerbated by the fact that average consumption is higher in the North of Scotland. Consumers with dynamically teleswitched meters operating in dynamic mode, all of which are located in Scotland, are not able to participate fully in the retail energy market and face particularly strong barriers to switching supplier and/or tariff. 
The CMA also found that consumers in Scotland are less likely to have been active in the market against key indicators of engagement than those in England.
Department of Energy and Climate Change data shows that electricity consumers in Scotland are more likely to be with their home supplier (the original supplier in a given area) compared with other British consumers, as shown in the figure below. However, gas consumers in the North of Scotland are less likely to be with their home supplier than the GB average.
Figure 9: Percentage of Customers on Home Electricity
Source: DECC Quarterly Energy Prices March 2016
The remedies proposed by the CMA need to continue to be assessed in the Scottish context to determine their potential impacts. The extent to which Scottish consumers respond to changes in the market is a critical factor in assessing how successfully the package of interventions will tackle consumer detriment in the Scottish context.
It is important to understand whether there are characteristics of Scottish consumers that make them inherently less likely to switch and therefore which policy interventions could increase the likelihood of switching. Our proposed research on switching will go some way to addressing this but further action may be necessary in the complex energy market.
The OFT's 2012 report, Price and Choice in Remote Communities, highlighted the issues of poor service and high charges for delivery, especially to the Highlands and Islands of Scotland, with concerns about the cost of delivery, suppliers refusing to deliver to remote locations, delivery times, misleading use of the term 'Free Mainland Delivery' and the unnecessary use of delivery services other than Royal Mail or alternative delivery hubs which might be cheaper.
In response to these and similar concerns, the Statement of Principles for parcel deliveries was launched by the Minister for Business, Energy and Tourism in November 2013. It sets out best practice principles for retailers to provide delivery services that meet the needs of their customers.  Although voluntary, the principles will help to support businesses, and lead to improvements in the number of customers abandoning purchases that they would otherwise have made.
In Citizens Advice Scotland's ( CAS's) report, The Postcode Penalty: The Distance Travelled  , published in September 2015, they reviewed the extent to which retailers' practice has improved since CAS's previous survey in 2012. The report looked at surcharges, exclusions and the variance between different retailers in their practice. While some improvements were noted, it still found that customers were facing disproportionate restrictions when it came to the delivery of their purchases.
ACTION: The Scottish Government will continue its discussions with stakeholders to explore a range of sustainable solutions for rural communities.
The CMA is currently undertaking market investigations into the energy and banking markets and has recently published proposals for competition in rail, while Ofcom has recently undertaken a review of digital communications. Many of these investigations may address the competition issues faced by Scottish consumers, and the Scottish Government will work closely with economic regulators and the CMA to implement and recommended changes to the market.
ACTION: The Scottish Government will continue to ensure on-going competition and regulatory investigations and studies take sufficient account of Scottish issues.
Potential Competition Issues in Areas of the Scottish Economy
Scottish Legal Framework
The distinct nature of the Scottish legal system means that related market failures in Scotland and detriment faced by Scottish consumers may be different from other UK jurisdictions. Therefore, it is important that these issues are highlighted in order to ensure that there is no undue detriment to Scottish consumers.
Tenement housing is a far greater component of the Scottish property market than in the rest of the UK with 34 per cent of households living in purpose-built blocks of flats or tenements  compared to 16 per cent in England and Wales. 
In 2009, the OFT carried out a market investigation of property managers in Scotland.  It found that although 70 per cent of those surveyed were happy with their property manager, a significant minority were not. It found issues in three main areas:
The OFT found very low levels of switching in the market; even when compared with sectors like banking where switching has typically been low. The switching of a property factor requires collective agreement from home-owners. The majority of consumers believed that they did not have sufficient knowledge of the switching process and one-third of consumers felt that the service they received from their property manager was not good value for money.
Barriers to Switching
Secondly, there were situations where it was particularly difficult for consumers to switch:
- Owner occupiers in ex-local authority properties within a predominantly social housing development are required to use the social housing landlord's property manager.
- A property manager is appointed by a developer on the completion of a new development to manage that site for a number of years.
- More generally title deeds (and deeds of conditions) may make it difficult to dismiss the incumbent property manager. However, the Title Conditions (Scotland) Act 2003 contains an overriding power for a two-thirds majority of owners to dismiss the factor. 
Thirdly, the OFT found that owners with a complaint had limited scope for redress. When using the property manager's own complaints system, many were left with the issue either unresolved or with an unsatisfactory response. The absence of advice and information and an effective system of redress meant that there was inadequate protection for consumers. 
Changes in the Property Factors Market
The Property Factors (Scotland) Act 2011 established a system of redress in the form of the Homeowner Housing Panel and a code of conduct for property factors which sets out minimum standards of practice. The code of conduct requires property factors to give all homeowners for whom they act a written statement of services including information as to the services to be provided, the fee to be charged and, importantly, clear information on how to change or terminate the service contract. 
Current Issues in the Market
Although the introduction of an effective system of redress is a significant improvement in the property factors market, problems still exist. There are still very low levels of awareness and engagement with the market which also means that there is a lack of competitive pressure on property factors which could lead to higher prices and lower service levels.
ACTION: In order to counter this, we have planned a public facing guidance on the provisions of the Title Conditions (Scotland) Act 2003 on the dismissal and replacement of property factors. This will ensure that consumers are better informed of their choice.
The CMA is currently carrying out a market study into legal services in England and Wales and it will be important to see how their findings may also apply to the Scottish market. The CMA plans to examine three key issues:
- whether consumers can drive effective competition by making informed purchasing decisions;
- whether consumers are adequately protected from potential harm or can obtain satisfactory redress if legal services go wrong; and
- how regulation and the regulatory framework impact on competition for the supply of legal services. 
The Scottish Government is currently considering the provision of consumer advocacy and redress for legal services and will examine similar issues to those of the CMA as well as considering how their findings may apply to the Scottish market.
In particular, there are concerns regarding consumers' awareness of the provision of unregulated legal services. Certain areas of the law are reserved to solicitors who must be regulated by the Law Society of Scotland. Other areas, however, are not reserved meaning that advice and representation can be handled by unregulated firms or a person who is not qualified to provide the service. Unregulated areas of the law include employment law, family law, personal injury and consumer matters. Consumers who purchase legal services in the unregulated legal sector are not offered the same protection as those in the regulated sector and are not covered by the Law Society's Indemnity Policy or Client Protection Fund nor by the Scottish Legal Complaints Commission.
Consumers, therefore, may be exposing themselves to potential harm, should something go wrong. In order for the legal market to function effectively, consumers should be empowered to make informed decision on the best product for them. However, the majority of consumers do not realise that not all legal services are regulated and so these consumers are not able to make an informed choice of service. 
ACTION: The Scottish Government will ensure that consumers are sufficiently informed about the difference between regulated and unregulated legal services.
In determining markets in which there may be specific detriment to Scottish consumers, one of the key consideration is whether or not the market is local to Scotland. It is key for the Scottish Government to gain an understanding of the features of these markets in order to be able to identify any competition concerns that are specific to Scotland. Examples of markets that are likely to be localised include perishables, heavy, low value, uneconomic to transport long distances or areas that are devolved to Scotland.
ACTION: The Scottish Government will work with key partners to undertake scoping research to establish the features of localised markets.
Empowering Consumers in Public and Private Markets
Well-informed consumers are a critical part of a functioning market. In both public and private markets, consumers often face complex decisions without clear information about prices and services available. Asymmetric information can act as a barrier to the effective functioning of a market. An important element of empowering consumers and ensuring that markets function effectively is making sure that they have sufficient information about the product they are buying and are able to use this information to compare between firms and products. However, in many markets the information may be complex or difficult to find, making it hard for consumers to make informed decisions.
Similarly, although choice can be used in public service markets as a way of improving performance and increasing the say that individuals have over the services they access, consumers often face complex decisions. In making decisions, consumers are faced with certain barriers: there is low awareness about the ability to choose, low ability to assess the information and make an informed choice and lack of capability to act.  There are also instances where it is inappropriate for consumers to have a choice in public services. For example, consumers are not in a position to make an informed decision about the medical treatment they require. GPs, therefore, are necessary to act on behalf of the patient to ensure they get the appropriate care.  A balance, therefore, is needed between providing consumers with a choice and ensuring that they are protected.
ACTION: The Scottish Government will consider how best to provide consumers with the information needed to make informed decisions in complex and difficult markets such as health and social care.
The provision of public transport is an area where competition, regulation and public provision must be carefully balanced. Public transport is an essential service for many consumers in their daily life. In particular in rural areas, access to affordable and reliable public transport is needed in order to provide people with access to services such as health, education and work.
Competition in transport services can bring benefits to consumers. Greater competition typically gives consumers greater choice of service at lower prices. However, competition can also lead to a lack of supply in rural areas or unprofitable, but necessary, routes. Some forms of transport, such as rail, have characteristics which raise issues that need to be addressed for competition to be feasible. In such cases, competition for the market in the form of franchise agreements ensures that consumers get a good quality service at a reasonable price.
As markets for transport in Scotland are complex and often involve lifeline services, it is important that consumers receive an affordable and reliable services. As the issues in these markets are so complex, detailed work is needed to assess whether there are any that may cause detriment to consumers. The Scottish Government will carry out further research in to transport services in order to consider whether markets are working effectively for consumers.
In all transport markets, whether there is public provision or competition (for or in the market), it is important to ensure the services are working well for consumers and that consumers are confident and knowledgeable. In order to protect and empower consumers, their views must be represented through effective advocacy and there must be clear routes to redress. Effective redress helps to inform competition policy as complaints data, when properly harnessed and aggregated, can identify problem areas within markets, or even specific areas of detriment.
ACTION: The Scottish Government will consider whether there is adequate provision of consumer advocacy and redress as the first stage of our in depth research into transport services in Scotland.