beta

You're viewing our new website - find out more

Publication - Consultation Paper

Review of colorectal cancer quality performance indicators: consultation

Published: 10 Mar 2017
Part of:
Health and social care
ISBN:
9781786528339

Consultation to gather views on NHSScotland's approach to treating colorectal cancer.

41 page PDF

604.4kB

41 page PDF

604.4kB

Contents
Review of colorectal cancer quality performance indicators: consultation
3. QPI Formal Review Process

41 page PDF

604.4kB

3. QPI Formal Review Process

As part of the National Cancer Quality Programme a systematic national review process has been developed whereby all tumour specific QPIs published are subject to formal review following 3 years analysis of comparative QPI data.

Formal review of the Colorectal Cancer QPIs was undertaken in December 2016.

A Formal Review Group was convened, chaired by Dr Rob Jones (Professor of Clinical Cancer Research and Honorary Consultant in Medical Oncology, Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre). Membership of this group included Clinical Leads from the three Regional Cancer Networks. Membership of this group can be found in appendix 3.

The formal review process is clinically driven with comments sought from specialty specific representatives in each of the Regional Cancer Networks for discussion at the initial meeting. This review builds on existing evidence using expert clinical opinion to identify where new evidence is available.

During formal review QPIs may be removed and replaced with new QPIs. Triggers for doing so include significant change to clinical practice, targets being consistently met by all Boards and publication of new evidence.

Any new QPIs have been developed in line with the following criteria:

  • Overall importance - does the indicator address an area of clinical importance that would significantly impact on the quality and outcome of care delivered?
  • Evidence based - is the indicator based on high quality clinical evidence?
  • Measurability - is the indicator measurable i.e. are there explicit requirements for data measurement and are the required data items accessible and available for collection?

Contact

Email: Chris Booth