beta

You're viewing our new website - find out more

Publication - Research Publication

Engaging and empowering communities and stakeholders in rural land use and land management in Scotland

Published: 29 Jul 2016
Part of:
Farming and rural, Research
ISBN:
9781786522603

Report on how best to assist rural communities to engage with decisions on land use and land management.

136 page PDF

1.5MB

136 page PDF

1.5MB

Contents
Engaging and empowering communities and stakeholders in rural land use and land management in Scotland
References

136 page PDF

1.5MB

References

Executive Summary

1. The Scottish Government. (2015). Community Empowerment and Engagement. Available: http://www.gov.scot/Topics/People/engage. Last accessed 11/12/2015.

2. Adapted from Bovaird, T (2006) Commission for Rural Community Development - Beyond Engagement and participation, user and community co-production of services. Carnegie Trust

Introduction

3. Wenger-Trayner, E. and Wenger-Trayner, B. (2015). Learning in Landscapes of Practice: A framework. Learning in landscapes of practice boundaries, identity and knowledgeability. London, United Kingdom: Routledge.

4. Rapport, J. (1984). Studies in empowerment: Introduction to the issue. Prevention in Human Services 3, 1-7.

5. Bailey, D. (1992). Using participatory research in community consortia development and evaluation: lessons from the beginning of a story. American Sociologist 23: 71-82.

6. The Scottish Government. (2015). Community Empowerment and Engagement. Available: http://www.gov.scot/Topics/People/engage. Last accessed 11/12/2015.

7. Bridges, W. (2009) Managing Transitions. De Capo Press pp 169.

Background and Context

1. Land Use Strategy 2016 - 2021. (2016). The Scottish Government. Available: http://www.gov.scot/Topics/Environment/Countryside/Landusestrategy. Last accessed 11/12/2015.

2. Convention on Biological Diversity. (2015). Ecosystem Approach. Available: https://www.cbd.int/ecosystem/principles.shtml. Last accessed 11/12/2015.

3. Aarhus, Denmark. (1998). Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters. Available: http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/env/pp/documents/cep43e.pdf. Last accessed 11/12/2015.

4. The European Parliament and of the Council. (2003). EU Participation Directive (2003/35/ EC). Available: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32003L0035. Last accessed 11/12/2015.

5. The European Parliament and of the Council. (2000). EU Water Framework Directive 2000/60/ EC. Available: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32000L0060. Last accessed 11/12/2015.

6. The European Parliament and of the Council. (2001). Strategic Environmental Assessment Directive 2001/42/ EC. Available: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32001L0042. Last accessed 11/12/2015.

7. Council of Europe. (1996). Pan-European Biological and Landscape Diversity Strategy. Ministerial Conference "Environment for Europe" (Sofia, Bulgaria, 23-25 October 1995). 74 (1), p1-66.

8. Brisbane Declaration. (2005). Available: http://www.ncdd.org/exchange/files/docs/brisbane_declaration.pdf. Last accessed 11/12/2015.

9. Scottish Government Website: http://www.gov.scot/Topics/People/engage Last accessed 26/02/2016

10. World Economic Forum. (2008). Water Security: The Water-Energy-Food-Climate Nexus. Available: http://www.weforum.org/reports/water-security-water-energy-food-climate-nexus. Last accessed 5th Jan 2016.

Literature Review

1. Rowlands, J. (1995). Empowerment examined. Development in practice 5: 101-107.

2. Connick, S. and Innes, J.E. (2003) Outcomes of collaborative water policy making: Applying complexity thinking to evaluation. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 46, 177-197.

3. Arnstein, S. R. (1969). "A Ladder of Citizen Participation," Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 35, No. 4, July 1969, pp. 216-224.

4. Hart, R. (1992). Children's Participation. Innocent Essays. (4), p1-41.

5. Wilcox, D. (1994). The Guide to Effective Participation. The Guide to Effective Participation. 1 (1), p1-28.

6. Forestry Commission (2011). Public Engagement in Forestry - A toolbox for public engagement in forest and woodland planning. Edinburgh.

7. IAP2 Spectrum: International Association of Public Participation. (2007). http://c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.iap2.org/resource/resmgr/imported/IAP2%20Spectrum_vertical.pdf. Accessed January 2016.

8. Arnstein, S. R. (1969). "A Ladder of Citizen Participation," Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 35, No. 4, July 1969, pp. 216-224.

9. Bovaird, T. (2006). Commission for Rural Community Development - Beyond Engagement and participation, user and community co-production of services. Carnegie Trust

10. Adapted from Bovaird, T (2006). Commission for Rural Community Development - Beyond Engagement and participation, user and community co-production of services. Carnegie Trust.

11. Pound, D. (2015). Designing and Facilitating consensus-building - Keys to Success. In: Redpath, S.M. Gutiérrez, R.J. Wood, K.A. & Young, J.C. Conflicts in Conservation. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. p240-253.

12. Pretty, J. & Ward, H. (2001). Social capital and the environment. World Development 29(2): br209- 227.

13. Buddery, P. and Shafique, A. (2013). Report on 'Environmental protection and management: a social productivity approach for SEPA and SNH'

14. Reed, M. S. A. Graves, N. Dandy, H. Posthumus, K. Hubacek, J. Morris, C. Prell, C. H. Quinn, and L. C. Stringer. (2009). Who's in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management 90(5): 1933-1949.

15. Stanghellini, P. S. L. (2010). Stakeholder involvement in water management: the role of the stakeholder analysis within participatory processes. Water Policy 12(5): 675-694.

16. NRC. (2008) Public Participation in Environmental Assessment and Decision Making. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

17. Newig, J. and O. Fritsch. (2009). Environmental governance: participatory, multi-level - and effective? Environmental Policy and Governance 19(3): 197-214.

18. Cuppen, E. (2012). Diversity and constructive conflict in stakeholder dialogue: considerations for design and methods. Policy Sciences 45(1): 23-46.

19. Studd, K. (2002). An Introduction to deliberative methods of stakeholder and public participation. English Nature Research Reports 474, 63pp.

20. Holmes, T. & Scones, I. (2000). Participatory Environment Processes; Experiences from North and South. IDS working paper. Institute of Development Studies, Brighton.

21. Brisbane Declaration. (2005). www.iap2.org.au/sitebuilder/resources/knowledge/asset/files/37/unbrisbanedeclarationcommunityengagement.pdf. Last accessed 21/12/2015.

22. Habermas, J. (1989) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Cambridge MA, MIT Press.

23. Daniels, S.E. & Walker, G.B. (1996) Collaborative learning: Improving public deliberation in ecosystem-based management. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 16, 71-102.

24. Bloomfield, D. Collins, K. Fry, C. Munton, R. (1998). Deliberative and inclusionary processes: Their contributions to environmental governance. 1st ESRC ' DIPs in environmental decision-making' seminar, 17th December 1998.

25. Bessette, J.M. (2001) Deliberation: Political Aspects. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 3377-3380.

26. Abelson, J. Forest, P. Eyles, J. Smith, P. Martin, E. & Gauvin, F.P. (2003). Deliberations about deliberative methods: issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes. Social Science & Medicine, 57, 239-251.

27. Patel, M. Kok, K. & Rothman, D.S. (2007). Participatory scenario construction in land use analysis: An insight into the experiences created by stakeholder involvement in the Northern Mediterranean, Land Use Policy 24, 546-561.

28. Elwyn G. (2010) Deliberation before determination: the definition and evaluation of good decision- making. Health Expectations 13, 139-147.

29. Mummery, J. Rodan, D. (2013). The role of blogging in public deliberation and democracy. Discourse, Context and Media 2, 22-39.

30. Halpern, D. & Gibbs, J. (2013). Social media as a catalyst for online deliberation? Exploring the affordances of Facebook and YouTube for political expression, Computers in Human Behavior 29, 1159-1168.

31. Reed, M. (2008). Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review Biological Conservation 141: 2417-2431.

32. Pound, D. (2009). Adopting effective stakeholder engagement processes to deliver regional Marine Protected Area ( MPA) network. Natural England Commissioned Report, Number 008.

33. Crawford, B. et al. (2010) Small scale fisheries management: Lessons from cockle harvesters in Nicaragua and Tanzania. Coastal Management 38, 195-215.

34. Gross, D.P. and Lowe, A. (2009) Evaluation of a knowledge translation initiative for physical therapists treating patients with work disability. Disability and Rehabilitation 31, 871-879.

35. Kenter, J. O. M. S. Reed, K. N. Irvine, E. O'Brien, E. Brady, R. Bryce, M. Christie, A. Church, N. Cooper, A. Davies, N. Hockley, I. Fazey, N. Jobstvogt, C. Molloy, J. Orchard-Webb, N. Ravenscroft, M. Ryan, and V. Watson. (2014). UK National Ecosystem Assessment Follow-on. Work Package Report 6: Shared, Plural and Cultural Values of Ecosystems. UNEP- WCMC, LWEC, UK.

36. Kirshbaum, M. (2008) Translation to practice: A randomised, controlled study of an evidence-based booklet for breast-care nurses in the United Kingdom. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing 5, 60-74.

37. Heylings, P. and Bravo, M. (2007) Evaluating governance: A process for understanding how co-management is functioning, and why, in the Galapagos Marine Reserve. Ocean and Coastal Management 50, 174-208.

38. Kuper, M. et al. (2009) Supporting the shift from state water to community water: Lessons from a social learning approach to designing joint irrigation projects in Morocco. Ecol. Soc. 14.

39. de Vente, J., et al. (in press) A participatory approach for selecting sustainable land and water management options in Drylands: A case study from SE-Spain. Ecology & Society.

40. Pound, D. 2009. Adopting effective stakeholder engagement processes to deliver regional Marine Protected Area ( MPA) network. Natural England Commissioned Report, Number 008.

41. Reed, M. S. 2008. Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review. Biological Conservation 141(10): 2417-2431.

42. Lee, M. and C. Abbot. 2003. 'Legislation: The Usual Suspects? Public Participation Under the Aarhus Convention.' The Modern Law Review 66 (1): 80-108.

43. Nelson, N., Wright, S., 1995. Power and participatory development: Theory and practice. Intermediate Technology Publications, London.

44. Duane,T.P., 1999. Shaping the Sierra: Nature Culture and Conflict in the Changing West. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.

45. Wondolleck, J.M., Yaffee, S.L., 2000. Making collaboration work: Lessons from innovation in natural resource management.Island Press, Washington, DC.

46. Cooke, B., Kothari, U. (Eds.) 2001. Participation: the New Tyranny? Zed Books, London.

47. Burton, P., Goodlad, R., Croft, J., Abbott, J., Hastings, A., Macdonald, G., Slater, T. 2004. What Works in Community Involvement in Area-Based Initiatives? A Systematic Review of the Literature. University of Bristol and University of Glasgow, London.

48. Gerrits, L. and J. Edelenbos. 2004. Management of sediments through stakeholder involvement. Journal of Soils and Sediments 4(4): 239-246.

49. Scott 2011, US. National Research Council report on 'Public Participation in Environmental Assessment and Decision Making' (2008)).

50. Creamer, E. C. (2015). 'Community': the ends and means of sustainability? Exploring the position and influence of community-led initiatives in encouraging more sustainable lifestyles in remote rural Scotland. PhD Thesis, University of Edinburgh.

51. NRC. (2008) Public Participation in Environmental Assessment and Decision Making. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

52. Ibid.

53. Ibid.

54. Reed, M. S., A. C. Evely, G. Cundill, I. Fazey, J. Glass, A. Laing, J. Newig, B. Parrish, C. Prell, C. Raymond, and L. C. Stringer. (2010). What is social learning? Ecology and Society 15(4): r1. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/resp1/

55. Lee, M. and C. Abbot. (2003). 'Legislation: The Usual Suspects? Public Participation Under the Aarhus Convention.' The Modern Law Review 66 (1): 80-108.

56. Reed, M. S. (2008). Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review. Biological Conservation 141(10): 2417-2431.

57. de Vente, J., et al. (in press) A participatory approach for selecting sustainable land and water management options in Drylands: A case study from SE-Spain. Ecology & Society.

58. Involve. (2005). People and Participation: How to put citizens at the heart of decision-making. London: Involve. URL: http://www.involve.org.uk/people-and-participation/ [Accessed January 2016]

59. Pound, D. (2009). Adopting effective stakeholder engagement processes to deliver regional Marine Protected Area ( MPA) network. Natural England Commissioned Report, Number 008.

60. Pound, D. (2004). Stakeholder dialogue - A good practice guide for users with lessons from the Isle of Silly AONB. Countryside Commission

61. Durham E., Baker H., Smith M., Moore E. & Morgan V. (2014). The BiodivERsA Stakeholder Engagement Handbook. BiodivERsA, Paris (108 pp). http://www.biodiversa.org/702

62. LWEC. (2012). Knowledge Exchange Guidelines. Available: http://issuu.com/profmarkreed/docs/lwec_ke_guidelines_2012. Last accessed 14 Jan 2016.

63. Reed, M. S. 2008. Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review. Biological Conservation 141(10): 2417-2431.

64. Reed, M.S. Bonn, A. Broad, K. Burgess, P. Fazey, I.R. Fraser, E.D.G. Hubacek, K. Nainggolan, D. Roberts, P. Quinn, C.H. Stringer, L.C. Thorpe, S. Walton, D.D. Ravera, F. Redpath, S. (2013). Participatory scenario development for environmental management: a methodological framework. Journal of Environmental Management 128: 345-362.

65. Reed, M.S. Stringer, L.C. Fazey, I. Evely, A.C. Kruijsen, J. (2014b). Five principles for the practice of knowledge exchange in environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management 146: 337-345.

66. Pound, D. (2015). Designing and facilitating consensus building - keys to success. Chapter 17 in Conflicts in Conservation: navigating towards solutions. Edited Redpath, S, M. Cambridge University Press.

67. Pound D. (2005), Planning landscapes for sustainability - the role of stakeholder participation. In McCollin, D. Jackson, J. (Editors) Planning, People and Practice. The landscape ecology of sustainable landscapes. IALE UK.

68. de Vente, J, M. Reed, L. C. Stringer, S.Valente, J. Newig. (2015) In press. How does the context and design of participatory decision making processes affect their outcomes? Evidence from sustainable land management in global drylands. Ecology & Society.

69. Involve. (2005). People and Participation: How to put citizens at the heart of decision-making. London: Involve. Available: http://www.involve.org.uk/people-and-participation/ Accessed January 2009.

70. Fazey, I. et al. (2010) A three-tiered approach to participatory vulnerability assessment in the Solomon Islands. Global Environmental Change 20, 713-728.

71. Meagher, L. et al. (2008) Flows of knowledge, expertise and influence: A method for assessing policy and practice impacts from social science research. Research Evaluation 17, 163-173.

72. Rowlands, J. (1995). Empowerment examined. Development in practice 5: 101-107.

73. Taliaferro. J. (2004) Power Polictics and the Balance of Risk: Hypotheses on Great Power Intervention in the Periphery

74. Evans K (2011) 'Big Society'in the UK: a policy review. Children & Society 25: 164-171.

75. Singleton, S. (2002). Collaborative Environmental Planning in the American West: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly. Environmental Politics 11(3): 54-75.

76. Ferreyra, C. R. C. de Loë, and R. D. Kreutzwiser. (2008). Imagined communities, contested watersheds: Challenges to integrated water resources management in agricultural areas. Journal of Rural Studies 24(3): 304-321.

77. Armitage, D., R. de Loë, and R. Plummer. (2012). Environmental governance and its implications for conservation practice. Conservation Letters 5(4): 245-255.

78. Rowlands, J. (1995). Empowerment examined. Development in practice 5: 101-107.

79. Kenny et al (2015) Land Based Social Enterprises - What is standing in the way of new models of common good land use? Shared Assets. Available: http://www.sharedassets.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Land-based-social-enterprise-FINAL.pdf Last accessed January 2016.

80. NRC. (2008) Public Participation in Environmental Assessment and Decision Making. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press

81. NRC. (2008) Public Participation in Environmental Assessment and Decision Making. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

82. Burgess, J., Harrison, C. & Filius, P. (1998). Environmental communication and the cultural politics of environmental citizenship, Environment and Planning A 30: 1445-1460.

83. The Theory of Reasoned Action and Theory of Planned Behaviour (Fishbein & Ajzen, 1975; Ajzen & Fishbein, 1980.

84. Stern, P. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues 56: 407-424.

85. Hargreaves, T. (2011). Practice-ing behaviour change: Applying social practice theory to pro-environmental behaviour change. Journal of Consumer Culture March. 11 (1), p79-99.

86. Hargreaves, T. (2011). Practice-ing behaviour change: Applying social practice theory to pro-environmental behaviour change. Journal of Consumer Culture March . 11 (1), p79-99.

87. Rogers, E.M. (2010). Diffusion of Innovations. 4th ed. United States: Simon & Schuster. p1-518.

88. Pound, D. (2015). Designing and facilitating consensus building - keys to success. Chapter 17 in Conflicts in Conservation: navigating towards solutions. Edited Redpath, S, M. Cambridge University Press

89. Argyris, C., and D. A. Schön, (1978). Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective Series on Organization Development. Addison-Wesley Reading, Massachusetts.

90. Fazey, I., J. A. Fazey, and D. M. A. Fazey. (2005). Learning more effectively from experience. Ecology and Society 10(2): 4.

91. Keen, M. and S. Mahanty. (2006). Learning in Sustainable Natural Resource Management: Challenges and Opportunities in the Pacific. Society & Natural Resources 19(6): 497-513.

92. Kenter, J. O., M. S. Reed, K. N. Irvine, E. O'Brien, E. Brady, R. Bryce, M. Christie, A. Church, N. Cooper, A. Davies, N. Hockley, I. Fazey, N. Jobstvogt, C. Molloy, J. Orchard-Webb, N. Ravenscroft, M. Ryan, and V. Watson. 2014. UK National Ecosystem Assessment Follow-on. Work Package Report 6: Shared, Plural and Cultural Values of Ecosystems. UNEP- WCMC, LWEC, UK.

93. Reed, M. S., A. C. Evely, G. Cundill, I. Fazey, J. Glass, A. Laing, J. Newig, B. Parrish, C. Prell, C. Raymond, and L. C. Stringer. 2010. What is social learning? Ecology and Society 15(4): r1. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/resp1/

94. Pahl-Wostl, C. and M. Hare. 2004. Processes of Social Learning in Integrated Resources Management. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 14(3): 193-206.

95. Siebenhüner, B., and J. Suplie. 2005. Implementing the access and benefit-sharing provisions of the CBD: A case for institutional learning. Ecological Economics 53: 507- 22.

96. Bennett, P., & Smith, S. J. (2007). Genetics, insurance and participation: how a citi- zens' jury reached its verdict. Social Science & Medicine 64: 2487-2498.

97. Lehoux, P. Daudelin, G. Demers-Payette, O. & Boivin, A. (2009). Fostering deliberations about health innovation: What do we want to know from publics? Social Science & Medicine 68: 2002-2009

98. Pellizzoni, L. 2003. Uncertainty and Participatory Democracy. Environmental Values 12(2): 195.

99. Taylor, B., and R. C. de Loë. 2012. Conceptualizations of local knowledge in collaborative environmental governance. Geoforum 43(6): 1207-1217.

100. Thomas, J. C. 1995. Public Participation in Public Decisions. New Skills and Strategies for Public Managers. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco.

101. Macnaghten, P., and M. Jacobs. 1997. Public identification with sustainable development. Investigating cultural barriers to participation. Global Environmental Change 7(1): 5-24.

102. Bulkeley, H., and A. P. J. Mol. 2003. Participation and Environmental Governance: Consensus, Ambivalence and Debate. Environmental Values 12(2): 143-54.

103. Papadopoulos, Y., and P. Warin. 2007. Are innovative, participatory and deliberative procedures in policymaking democratic and effective? European Journal of Political Research 46: 445-72.

104. NRC. (2008) Public Participation in Environmental Assessment and Decision Making. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press

105. Coglianese, C. 1997. Assessing consensus: the promise and performance of negotiated rule making. Duke Law Journal 46: 1255-346.

106. Pound. D., (2015) Fair inclusion: a participatory method for creating balanced and legitimate stakeholder groups. Unpublished. Dialogue Matters.

107. Koontz, T. M. 2005. We Finished the Plan, So Now What? Impacts of Collaborative Stakeholder Participation on Land Use Policy. Policy Studies Journal 33(3): 459-481.

108. Stringer, L. C., C. Twyman, and D. S. G. Thomas. 2007. Combating land degradation through participatory means: the case of Swaziland. Ambio 36(5): 387-393.

109. Blicharska, M., K. Isaksson, T. Richardson, and C. J. Wu. 2011. Context dependency and stakeholder involvement in EIA: the decisive role of practitioners. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 54(3): 337-354.

110. Involve (2005) The True Costs of Public Participation. Full report. Written by Edward Andersson and Diane Warburton. Involve, London

111. Warburton. D. (2009) Sciencewise Evidence Counts - Understanding the Value of Public Dialogue. Sciencewise

Findings from surveys and questionnaires

1. Working together for Sustasinable Estate Communities; Exploring the potential of collaborative initiatives between privately owned estates, communities and other partners. University of the Highlands and Islands.

2. Southern, A., Lovett, A., O'Riordan, T., & Watkinson, A. (2011). Sustainable landscape governance: Lessons from a catchment based study in whole landscape design. Landscape and Urban Planning, 101(2), 179-189.

3. Bergmann, A., Colombo, S., & Hanley, N. (2008). Rural versus urban preferences for renewable energy developments. Ecological economics, 65(3), 616-625.

4. Cowell, R. (2010). Wind power, landscape and strategic, spatial planning-the construction of 'acceptable locations' in Wales. Land Use Policy, 27(2), 222-232.

5. Munday, M., Bristow, G., & Cowell, R. (2011). Wind farms in rural areas: How far do community benefits from wind farms represent a local economic development opportunity? Journal of Rural Studies, 27(1), 1-12.

6. Munday, M., Bristow, G., & Cowell, R. (2011). Wind farms in rural areas: How far do community benefits from wind farms represent a local economic development opportunity? Journal of Rural Studies, 27(1), 1-12.

7. Lambert, R. A. (2011). Strangers in a Familiar Land: The Return of the Native 'Aliens' and the (Re) Wilding of Britain's Skies. Invasive and introduced plants and animals: Human perceptions, attitudes and approaches to management, 169-184.

8. Brown, K. M., & Slee, B. (2002, June). Salience and its implications for Common-Pool Resource management in Scotland: a tragedy of a different kind? In The International Association for the Study of Common Property ( IASCP) 2002 Conference. Victoria Falls, Zimbabwe.

9. Glass, J., Price, M., Warren, C., & Scott, A. (Eds.). (2013). Lairds, Land and Sustainability: Scottish Perspectives on Upland Management. Edinburgh University Press.

10. Condon, P.M., (2012). Design charrettes for sustainable communities. Island Press.

11. Pound, D. 2011. The Eco What Approach? In Landscape Ecology and Ecosystem Services. IALE UK

12. ECOPAG. (2010). Environmental Consequences of Participatory Governance - A Comparative Meta-Analysis of Case Studies in Environmental Decision-Making. Available: http://www.edge-project.eu/ecopag/home/. Last accessed 5th Jan 2016.

13. de Vente, J, M. Reed, L. C. Stringer, S.Valente, J. Newig. In press. How does the context and design of participatory decision making processes affect their outcomes? Evidence from sustainable land management in global drylands. Ecology & Society.

14. Pound, D. (2009). Adopting effective stakeholder engagement processes to deliver regional Marine Protected Area ( MPA) network. Natural England Commissioned Report, Number 008

15. Kenter, J. O., M. S. Reed, K. N. Irvine, E. O'Brien, E. Brady, R. Bryce, M. Christie, A. Church, N. Cooper, A. Davies, N. Hockley, I. Fazey, N. Jobstvogt, C. Molloy, J. Orchard-Webb, N. Ravenscroft, M. Ryan, and V. Watson. 2014. UK National Ecosystem Assessment Follow-on. Work Package Report 6: Shared, Plural and Cultural Values of Ecosystems. UNEP- WCMC, LWEC, UK.

Recommendations

16. Van Boven, G. and Hesselink, F. (2003). Conservation Results by Managing Change, the role of communication, education and public awareness. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN Commission on Education and Communication.

17. Adapted from Van Boven, G. and Hesselink, F. (2003). Conservation Results by Managing Change, the role of communication, education and public awareness. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN Commission on Education and Communication.

18. Rogers, E. (2003).Diffusion of Innovations. Simon and Schuster. 576pp

19. Murdoch, J. (2000). Networks-a new paradigm of rural development?. Journal of rural studies, 16(4), 407-419.

20. Reed MS (2008) Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biological Conservation 141: 2417-2431.

21. Pound, D. (2014) Pros and cons of in house facilitators versus independent professionals - findings from 60 discussions. Training Materials. Dialogue Matters.

22. Ibid

Annex 1

1. Scottish Government. (2011). Getting the best from our land - A land use strategy for Scotland. Available: http://www.gov.scot/Publications/2011/03/17091927/0. Last accessed 10th February 2016.

2. Parliament. (2006). Planning etc. (Scotland) Act. Available: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/asp/2006/17/contents. Last accessed 21/12/2015.

3. June 2013 Ministerial Announcement (See also One Million Acres by 2020 - Strategy report and recommendations from the 1 Million Acre Short Life Working Group. December 2015)

Annex 2

1. Forestry Commission Scotland. (2006). The Scottish Forestry Strategy. Available: http://scotland.forestry.gov.uk/supporting/strategy-policy-guidance/forestry-strategy. Last accessed 11/12/2015.

2. National Planning Framework 3. (2015) Available: http://www.gov.scot/Topics/Built-Environment/planning/National-Planning-Framework. Last accessed 11/12/2015.

3. National Forest Land Scheme ( NFLS). (2015). Forestry Commission Scotland. Available: http://scotland.forestry.gov.uk/supporting/strategy-policy-guidance/communities/national-forest-land-scheme-nfls. Last accessed 11/12/2015.

4. Outdoor Access - Scotland. (2015). Available: http://www.outdooraccess-scotland.com. Last accessed 11/12/2015.

5. Woods In and Around Towns ( WIAT). (2015). Forestry Commission Scotland. Available: http://scotland.forestry.gov.uk/supporting/strategy-policy-guidance/communities/woods-in-and-around-towns-wiat. Last accessed 11/12/2015.

6. Scottish Sustainable Communities Initiative. (2011). The Scottish Government. Available: http://www.gov.scot/Topics/Built-Environment/AandP/Projects/SSCI. Last accessed 11/12/2015.

7. The Crofters (Scotland) Act. (1993). Crofting Scotland. Available: http://www.crofting.scotland.gov.uk/legislation.asp. Last accessed 11/12/2015.

8. Climate Change (Scotland) Act. (2009). The Scottish Government. Available: http://www.gov.scot/Topics/Environment/climatechange/scotlands-action/climatechangeact. Last accessed 11/12/2015.

9. Scotland's Climate Change Adaptation Framework. (2009). The Scottish Government. Available: http://www.gov.scot/Topics/Environment/climatechange/scotlands-action/adaptation/AdaptationFramework. Last accessed 11/12/2015.

10. The Flood Risk Management (Scotland) Act. (2009). The Scottish Government. Available: http://www.gov.scot/Topics/Environment/Water/Flooding/FRMAct. Last accessed 11/12/2015

Annex 4

1. Fazey, I. , et al. (2013) Knowledge Exchange: A review and research agenda for environmental management. Environmental Conservation 40: 19-36.

2. Williams, G., et al. (2003) Participation and power: Poor people's engagement with India's employment assurance scheme. Development and Change 34: 163-192.

3. Reed, M.S. (2008) Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review. Biological Conservation 141: 2417-2431.

4. Chambers, R. (1997) Whose Reality Counts?: Putting the First Last. ITDG Publishing

5. Partidário, M.R. and Sheate, W.R. (2012) Knowledge brokerage - potential for increased capacities and shared power in impact assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 39: 26-36.

6. Valorinta, M., et al. (2011) Path Dependence of Power Relations, Path-Breaking Change and Technological Adaptation. Industry and Innovation 18, 765-790.

7. Hatt, K. (2012) Social Attractors: A Proposal to Enhance 'Resilience Thinking' about the Social. Soc. Nat. Resour. 26, 30-43.

8. Gaventa, J. (1980) Power and powerlessness : quiescence and rebellion in an Appalachian valley. Clarendon Press.

9. Avelino, F. and Rotmans, J. (2009) Power in transition: An interdisciplinary framework to study power in relation to structural change. European Journal of Social Theory 12, 543-569.

10. Ingram, H. and Stern, P. (2007) Research and Networks for Decision Support in the NOAA Sectoral Applications Research Program.

11. Whiteley, J., et al. (2008) Water, place and equity. MIT Press

12. Foucault, M. and Gordon, C. (1980) Power/knowledge: selected interviews and other writings, 1972/1977. Harvester Press

13. Barnes, B. (1983) Social-Life as Bootstrapped Induction. Sociology 17, 524-545.

14. Connick, S. and Innes, J.E. (2003) Outcomes of collaborative water policy making: Applying complexity thinking to evaluation. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 46, 177-197.

15. Chambers, R. (1997) Whose Reality Counts?: Putting the First Last. ITDG Publishing.

16. Connick, S. and Innes, J.E. (2003) Outcomes of collaborative water policy making: Applying complexity thinking to evaluation. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 46, 177-197.

17. Kuper, M. , et al. (2009) Supporting the shift from state water to community water: Lessons from a social learning approach to designing joint irrigation projects in Morocco. Ecology & Society 14.

18. Pound, D. (2014) Training materials. Dialogue Matters.

19. Kenter, J.O. Reed, M.S. Irvine, K.N. O'Brien, E. Brady, E. Bryce, R. Christie, M. Church, A. Cooper, N. Davies, A. Hockley, N. Fazey, I. Jobstvogt, N. Molloy, C. Orchard- Webb, J. Ravenscroft, N. Ryan, M. Watson, V. (2014) UK National Ecosystem Assessment follow-on phase, technical report: Shared, Plural and Cultural Values of Ecosystems. UNEP- WCMC, Cambridge.

20. Crompton, T. (2010) Common Cause The Case for Working with our Cultural Values. WWFUK.

21. Sanderson, B. (2013). Money talks: the impact of economic framing on how we act and feel. Available: http://publicinterest.org.uk/money-talks-the-impact-of-economic-framing-on-how-we-act-and-feel/. Last accessed 5th Jan 2016.

22. Rowlands, J. (1995). Empowerment examined. Development in practice 5: 101-107.

23. Luttrell, C. Quiroz, S. Scrutton, C. & Bird, K. (2009). Understanding and operationalising empowerment. London, UK: Overseas Development Institute.

24. Lips, H. (1991). Women, men and power. Mountain View, CA: Mayfeld.

25. Pound, D. (2004) Training Manual. Dialogue Matters pp 105

26. Rowlands, J. (1995). Empowerment examined. Development in practice 5: 101-107.

27. Conger, J. A. & Kanungo, R. N. (1988). The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice. Academy of management review 13: 471-482.

28. Israel, B. A. Checkoway, B. Schulz, A. & Zimmerman, M. (1994). Health education and community empowerment: conceptualizing and measuring perceptions of individual, organizational, and community control. Health Education & Behaviour 21: 149-170.

29. Parsons, R.J. (1991). Empowerment: purpose and practice principle in social work. Social Work with Groups 14: 7-21.

Annex 10

1. Murdoch, J. (2000). Networks-a new paradigm of rural development?. Journal of rural studies, 16(4), 407-419.

2. Yuliani, E. L., Adnan, H. and Indriatmoko, Y. (2008). The Use of Appreciative Inquiry as a Tool for Enhancing Adaptive Capacity in Natural Resources Management. Cheltenham: IASC Conference.

3. Bandura, A. (2007). Impeding ecological sustainability through selective moral disengagement. Int. J. Innov. Sustain. Dev., 2, 8-35.

4. Sutton, R., Douglas, K. and Murphy, A. (2012). Engaging Communities in Climate Change and Adaptation Measures. A review of relevant psychological science. University of Kent: CC2150 InterReg Project.

5. Pound, D. (2015). Designing and Facilitating consensus-building - Keys to Success. In: Redpath, S.M. Gutiérrez, R.J. Wood, K.A. & Young, J.C. Conflicts in Conservation. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. p240-253.

6. Ibid


Contact