Rented sector reform: landlord and tenant engagement questionnaire - analysis report

Analysis of responses to the landlord and tenant engagement questionnaire on proposals for rented sector reform.


4: Tenancy proposals

Ending assured and short assured tenancies

The questionnaire form noted that the intent of The Private Housing (Tenancies) (Scotland) Act 2016, which introduced PRTs, was that PRTs would be the main tenancy for the private rented sector going forwards, with assured and short assured tenancies falling away over time as they were replaced by PRTs.

Question 20 – Given PRTs were introduced in Scotland more than five years ago, should consideration be given to setting a future date by which remaining assured and short assured tenancies should be phased out?

Responses to Question 20 by respondent type are set out in Table 18 below.

Table 18
Respondent group Yes, consideration should be given to setting a future date No, consideration should not be given to setting a future date Total answering
PRS landlord 1150 1594 2744
42% 58%
PRS landlord organisation 83 116 199
42% 58%
SRS landlord 34 34 68
50% 50%
SRS landlord organisation 6 8 14
43% 57%
PRS tenant 1866 36 1902
98% 2%
PRS tenant organisation 8 5 13
62% 38%
SRS tenant 254 4 258
98% 2%
SRS tenant organisation 3 1 4
75% 25%
None of the above 914 58 972
94% 6%
None selected 287 9 296
97% 3%
Total 4605 1865 6550
% of those answering 71% 29%

A majority of respondents, 71% of those answering the question, thought that consideration should be given to setting a future date by which remaining assured and short assured tenancies should be phased out, while the remaining 29% did not.

Support was strongest amongst PRS and SRS tenants, and those in the ‘None of the above’ and ‘None selected’ groups, ranging from 94% to 98% thinking that consideration should be given to setting a future date. A smaller majority of PRS landlords, PRS landlord organisations and SRS landlord organisations supported the move, at 58%, 58% and 57% respectively, while SRS landlords were evenly divided on this issue.

Ending a joint tenancy

The Scottish Government is exploring the introduction of a new approach to deal with circumstances where it is not possible for joint tenants to agree to end a joint tenancy. This process would enable one, or more, joint tenants to end the tenancy without the agreement of all, but only after providing reasonable notice to other joint tenants.

Where there is no agreement between the joint tenants to allow one of them to leave the tenancy, the tenant who wishes to go would be required to give a fixed amount of notice to all other joint tenants of their intention to end the tenancy for all.

The period of time between the departing tenant giving this notice to the other tenants and the final notice to leave being given to the landlord would be set out in law. This period of time would give the other joint tenants time to consider their own circumstances and to come to an agreement with the exiting tenant.

Question 21 – Do you agree that the notice period which the departing joint tenant must give to the other joint tenants should be 2 months?

Responses to Question 21 by respondent type are set out in Table 19 below.

Table 19
Respondent group Yes, 2 months is an appropriate notice period No, the notice period should be longer No, the notice period should be shorter Total answering
PRS landlord 2115 293 386 2794
76% 10% 14%
PRS landlord organisation 148 21 32 201
74% 10% 16%
SRS landlord 42 8 17 67
63% 12% 25%
SRS landlord organisation 9 0 5 14
64% 0% 36%
PRS tenant 1839 27 34 1900
97% 1% 2%
PRS tenant organisation 11 1 1 13
85% 8% 8%
SRS tenant 251 1 6 258
97% 0% 2%
SRS tenant organisation 4 0 0 4
100% 0% 0%
None of the above 933 18 21 972
96% 2% 2%
None selected 293 1 1 295
99% 0% 0%
Total 5645 370 503 6518
% of those answering 87% 6% 8%

A substantial majority of respondents, 87% of those answering the question, agreed that the notice period which the departing joint tenant must give to the other joint tenants should be 2 months.

A clear majority of respondents in all groups agreed with the proposal, although at a lower level for PRS landlord and PRS landlord organisations, at 76% and 74% respectively, and SRS landlords and SRS landlord organisations, at 63% and 64% respectively.

Contact

Email: housing.legislation@gov.scot

Back to top